Main

March 05, 2008

30 Days Hath September...and December...and Vern, or Sol, or Cosmic?

Have you seen the proposal for a 13-month calendar? Each month would have exactly 28 days and exactly four weeks. No need to remember the confusing nursery rhymes or knuckle counting. In fact, your birthday would be on the SAME DAY OF THE WEEK every year. So would Christmas, for that matter. Of course Easter, being governed by a calendar even more archaic and awkward than our current one, would continue to float wildly from one month to the next (staying on a Sunday, I presume).

You could get paid every two weeks just like clockwork - always on a Friday (not like us which is that we get paid Friday if payday falls on a Saturday, and Monday if it falls on a Sunday - whatever). Think of all the things that would fall into line with a calendar of such accuracy, predictability and precision.

It's so crazy it just might work, except not. Because like the metric system, it's logical. and simple. and easy to use. Which means it doesn't have a chance of catching on here in America. Ok, and maybe it takes a day tweak here or there.

Apparently, the ideas for a 13-month calendar go back to 1849, with each subsequent group to propose it using the idea to promote their own name for the 13th month (or all of them in some cases). The first version got bogged down in all it's political/sociological "Positivist" renaming of months and holidays. Then the next guy decided to leave everything the same except add a new month called "Sol". "Vern" is what the original proposers of this idea to the US House (in 1922!) decided to name the 13th month, to "include the Vernal Equinox and begin Spring." Heh. I'll bet the original brain behind this bill was a guy named "Vern" who came up with a reason to name the month after him.

There is currently another promoting a 13 month calendar, but under the auspices of world peace and moon celebration. They would rename all the months to such inspirational titles as "Magnetic", "Self-Existing", and "Cosmic" (scroll down). They would also add a non-existent day each year to balance the calendar and celebrate peace. I think I prefer "Vern".

November 04, 2007

Chicken Enchilada Soup

Since the weather has truly turned into fall (as evidenced by how many days I have recently grabbed turtlenecks and sweaters out of my closet) my cravings have turned to soup. I’ve dug out all my cookbooks and weblinks and gathered a few new recipes to try. My mom is also having a series of dental surgeries, and I’m planning to bring her a bunch of frozen homemade soups to enjoy during her recoveries, so I'm sure she'll be glad of the variety.

Since it’s NaBloPoMo and all, I’ll share my favorites here. (Such a win-win ). And bonus for all of us: today’s entry lets me spout more random mavinformationTM (this is my new homemade word for “maven information”). (Win-win-win!) Ok, so maybe you're not thrilled about the random trivia part - oh,well.

I love chicken enchilada soup. I nearly always order it if it’s on the menu (Chili’s has such a great one that I hardly know what their entrées taste like – I never get past the soup). My favorite characteristics are the creamy thickness, the spice, bits of tomato, the big chunks of shredded chicken and the cheese, ooh the cheese.

The Chili’s copy-cat recipes on the web all call for Velveeta. I can’t bear to feed my family an entire block of “processed cheese food”, so that was a no-go. Also, I wanted to add some favorite things to it – I figured if I’m going to make it myself, I might as well (it’s my kitchen after all).

So, here’s what I came up with, followed by some mavinformationTM about masa and corn and lime. If you’d like to print the recipe for yourself, I’ve posted it as a Word doc and also as a PDF.

Please leave a comment if you try it – and I’d love any soup recipes (without beef) that you have to share!

Chicken Enchilada Soup

2-3 T. vegetable oil
3 cups diced yellow onion
3 t. ground cumin
2 t. chili powder
½ t. cayenne pepper (omit if you don’t want the heat)
3 cloves garlic, pressed
2 cups masa harina with lime, or instant masa* (NOT regular corn meal)
3 ½-4 quarts chicken broth, divided
1 20 oz can diced tomatoes in juice, undrained
4 cups cooked, shredded chicken
1 can black beans, drained and rinsed
1 cup frozen or fresh white corn (canned doesn’t hold up as well in soup, and white is heartier)
Juice of 3 limes (or more, if your limes are stingy)

Garnishes:
Shredded cheddar and Monterey jack cheese (or pepper jack if you want more kick)
Chopped avocado
Sour cream
Crumbled tortilla chips


Heat oil in a very large stockpot and sauté onions and spices for about 5 minutes, until onions are just soft. Add garlic and sauté for an additional minute.

In a separate bowl, whisk the masa harina into 1 quart of broth until smooth (this will be thick like cream of wheat). Add the masa mix to the onions and bring to a boil. Boil, stirring constantly, for 2-3 minutes (this cooks the bitter taste out of the masa). Add remaining 2 ½ quarts broth to the pot, reserving the last ½ quart in case you need it at the end. Stir in the chicken and the tomatoes with their juice. Simmer for about 5-10 minutes.

Add the beans and corn. Heat until corn is thawed. If soup is too thick, add the remaining broth. Stir in the lime juice.

To serve, sprinkle some cheese in the bottom of a bowl, add soup on stop and stir to combine. Add avocado, sour cream, and tortilla bits as desired. Strangely enough, it's actually still really good without the cheese.


* I had to go to a Mexican tienda to find this. It is NOT regular corn meal. It is tortilla or tamale flour, which is corn flour mixed with lime (the chemical calcium hydroxide, not the citrus fruit). Why lime? Well, now it’s time for some mavinformationTM:

The maize that the ancient Mayans and Aztecs used is not like the super sweet corn we have in America today. (We have developed such a taste for sweetness that even our vegetables/grains/fruits have been bred for this characteristic – today’s corn has 2-4 TIMES the sugar as original corn). Their corn had bigger kernels and was white.
The skins of the kernels were undigestible and the nutrituion from the corn was largely unavailable to the body in this form, causing malnutrition and the disease called pallegra in societies that depended on corn as a main source of food.

The Mayans discovered that by mixing the maize with lime, it started a chemical process that broke down the kernels, making them digestible and also making the niacin in the corn available for the body (this is what prevents pallegra). Fresh maize was mixed with woodash (the residue from cooking fires) and water, cooked for a bit and then left to soak overnight. The lime broke down the skins and they floated to the surface where they were skimmed off. The maize was then drained and ground into a paste. This process is also called nixtamalization. Apparently the nixtamalization is not required when powerful mills are used (such as in industrialized nations), but it is necessary when grinding corn by hand.

How on earth did these ancient peoples figure out that woodash from their cooking fires was the secret to beating malnutrion? THAT I cannot find the answer to. I thought that the first time I read found this information (however many years ago), I learned that corn mixed in a certain place was toxic, but mixed in another was okay to eat. The corn from the edible had lime naturally occurring in it from cave formations dripping into the water and eventually the Mayans figured out the lime water was the secret. However, I can’t find the source of that information, so take it with a grain of salt. Salt is always good on tortillas.

July 11, 2007

100 Words Every High School Graduate Should Know...Well OK, only 25 of them

I'm not much of a meme-r, but I love Defective Yeti, I love words, and I'm a maven. Therefore, there was no way I could resist taking this quiz and posting my results. I encourage you to try it too. If you do, leave a comment with a link to your blog. (Jen the Knitting Queen, I'm looking at YOU!)

The editors of the American Heritage dictionary recently compiled a list of "100 words they recommend every high school graduate should know."

I always like to check out lists like this, and see how many of the entries I am already familiar with. The answer is, invariably, "nearly all of them." Not because I have a stellar vocabulary, but because I cheat.

Not on purpose, of course. But, when performing this exercise, I'm always struck with "well that's what I meant" syndrome. You know how it goes. You see the word, you say to yourself "that means X," you check the definition, and when it turns out that it actually meant Y, you say, "ah, well, that's I meant. And, jeeze, X and Y are practically the same thing ... so, I'm going to give myself this one." By the time I'm done, I have magnanimously "given" myself all of them, and have no idea how many I actually knew before I started.

So this time I tried something new: I wrote down my definitions first, and then compared them to the actual definitions afterwards. (and then he wrote a cool utility so we could do it, too)
from Defective Yeti

I also usually give myself more points than I deserve by saying "sure, that's it". It was fun to have the quiz keep me honest. I find it is so interesting how contextual my knowledge is. I have learned most of my vocabulary through reading, where I can get the "gist" of a word without understanding it completely. Or, apparently, with gathering the opposite meaning. The acquisition of language is fascinating to me.

Here is the overview of my results:
I knew the words in green; I did not know the words in red. In total, I knew 20 of 25.

abjure
abrogate
antebellum
belie
bellicose
circumlocution
circumnavigate
deciduous
enervate
epiphany
facetious
feckless
hypotenuse
lugubrious
mitosis
nihilism
omnipotent
paradigm
reparation
soliloquy
subjugate
suffragist
tautology
vortex
winnow

Details of my results are after the jump...

Continue reading "100 Words Every High School Graduate Should Know...Well OK, only 25 of them" »

June 12, 2007

I am a Maven

Our book group recently read The Tipping Point by Malcolm Gladwell. Although I'm not really a business-minded person, I found it interesting from a sociological perspective. But the point of this post is not really the book, but one of Gladwell's concepts.

In the beginning, Gladwell introduces the key players of Connectors, Mavens, and Salesmen. As we each read the book, we thought about who in our group fit into which category. The group (which happens to contain my 3 very bestest friends) was unanimous in calling me a Maven.

Gladwell describes a Maven as someone who researches everything. They know how things work, how to get the best deal, and why things are the way they are. Mavens feel compelled to share their knowledge out of the goodness of their heart, and out of the true desire to help people. (I had to emphasize that because it felt good to hear it explained that way - I always worried that I was coming across as a know-it-all. I don't correct people (because it's not polite) and I don't try to spout knowledge just to make myself look smart. I really don't. I just. feel. compelled. to. share. information. It's a sickness. But at least now I know it's perhaps a valuable sickness, and not entirely annoying).

I've always had a head for what I call "useless trivia" - I don't know enough about any one area to be an expert, but if you're researching something, or playing Trivial Pursuit, you want me on your team. When "Who Wants to be a Millionaire" was in its Philbin-powered heyday, my friends always said I'd be the one they'd call for their "Phone-a-Friend Lifeline".

So now I have a fun nickname, and it's actually nice to have a name for my annoying sickness. Now, instead of spouting random, well-researched trivia and wondering what everyone is thinking about me, I can just preface it by saying, "Because I am a Maven..."

So now I have an excuse for a new category on my blog and an outlet for all these bits of information that I find fascinating and am compelled to research.

Aren't you excited?